Harris and
Klebold, students, arrive at school in Columbine, Colorado, United States of
America. They then enter on it and a few minutes later these two guys start
shooting other students and dropping bombs wherever they go – a lot of people
die. They finally kill themselves right inside the school. This is not a movie.
This is not a book. This is not fiction. It really happened in April 20, 1999. We
first create weapons it to hunt and feed, than we start defending ourselves
from possible enemies or from nature, later we hurt people to gather
information (I personally don’t think this is an excuse) and today, well, today
we almost do not use it to hunt.
A long time
ago, we used stones as a tool to hunt. Moreover, if we could hunt, we could
eat! It was a practical use of a weapon and it helped us to survive and develop
new ways to obtain food, it was new technology that at that time had a purpose.
As time
goes by, people developed new purposes for stones! Yes, we found out that we
could not only hunt, but hurt! And these two little letters make a big
difference in creativity. That was when we invented more types of weapons, and
people could use it in many ways of hurting. It was a time to defend ourselves
from enemies, conquer lands, to get back heritages, and sometimes we could even
use it to have some food. The development of weapon changes the rhythm and
objectives.
Today, we
are in a mess. We no longer have control on what we are doing and weapons
became dangerous. Our society has so many technologies around new researches of
arms and almost everyone have access to guns. We became a violent civilization
(mess + free access to weapon = civilization?), where to have a weapon is a
powerful thing or even safe. Cops have weapons to protect a community from
criminals, government have weapons to keep enemies way from their lands, women
have weapons to feel safe, men have weapons to show their power, and do
teenagers have weapons to kill?
Again an excellent discussion. I am not sure where it is coming from but it is good anyway. I was expecting you to discuss the Cnd Government spying on Brazilian companies. Maybe next time.
ReplyDeleteThe whole arms race is a wierd thing when one starts to analyse it technologically and sociologically. One can also model arms races mathematically in a way that is surprisingly accurate but that is another class.
Technologically it can be very exciting as we try to discover that next "big stick". But if the next big stick is a nuclear weapon? I am reading a novel these days about biological weapons. Basically a parasite that infects the brain and turns the host (humans) into super killers. What kind of technology is that? The sociological implications there are clear. This goes way beyond the use of technology as a way to feed one's family or to, as the Americans famously claim, fulfill one's right to bear arms.
Coincidentally I saw a video today that describes violence, in particular gun violence, as an epidemic and suggests treating it as such...much the same as one might treat an outbreak of malaria. It seems to be gaining some traction. Have a look:
http://www.ted.com/talks/gary_slutkin_let_s_treat_violence_like_a_contagious_disease.html